Showing posts with label James Ellroy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label James Ellroy. Show all posts

Thursday, September 27, 2018

A Feast of Death


Of all living authors, my favorite is without doubt James Ellroy. Sprawling epic novels based on terse, tense text. He has a profound message; I often wonder if it can be seen behind his macho posing. Ellroy has made himself the subject of any conversation about his writings to the degree that Tom Wolfe or Kurt Vonnegut did; he dominates American literature today. But there seems to be a hidden agenda in Ellroy's writings that he does his damnest to keep from the public.



Without a doubt, Ellroy has one of the most famous origin stories ever for a writer. At around the age of ten, with divorced parents, he came home to his mother's house to find out that she had been murdered. It was a shock for the kid. To make things worse, a newspaper photographer shot a picture of him trying to make a sandwich while he was coping with the news.


It was a seminal moment in his life; it took over twenty years for him to move past that trouble. Moving in with his father, becoming a lost child, morphing into a rather nasty young peeping tom, a disastrous attempt at joining the military; all bad turns. He tells the story repeatedly, even turning it, as well as the search for his mother's killer - it is still an unsolved homicide - into a couple of non-fiction books, one of which was the New York Times' Book of the Year.


Ellroy became a crime obsessed creep, eventually turning to drugs and alcohol. His life washed up, both parents dead, it wasn't until he was nearly 30 that he sobered up, turning his life around. He began writing crime fiction to feed the paperback boom. Interestingly, by his second novel, he was starting to create some of the characters that wound up in his L.A. Quartet, although those were still five years away.


It took six novels for James Ellroy to be able to stop working as a caddy in a country club, becoming a full time author. He was stumbling toward a style, but it wasn't there yet, except that he almost only wrote about the City of Lost Angels, Los Angeles. He didn't really get into his signature neo-noir mode until his seventh novel, 'The Black Dahlia'. It was here that Ellroy's obsessions came together and produced his first masterpiece.


His mother and the unsolved mutilation of a Hollywood party girl meld into a story told as a modern hard boiled detective novel. The protagonists are obsessed, the killers are obsessed. It is told in an obsessive style. It catapulted Ellroy onto the top of the crime fiction field. The following is the oldest video of James that I could find; he has the 'Demon Dog of American Fiction' and the dog howl down, but he is still soft spoken.



With 'The Big Nowhere', the canvas starts to expand. There had been a revival of film noir in the mid 1970s, with 'Chinatown' and a couple of Phillip Marlowe movies starring Robert Mitchum, among others. No one had touched the Red Scare, especially from the point of view of law enforcement working for political advancement. All the pieces were suddenly in place for Ellroy to become a major literary figure.


With 'L.A. Confidential' he did not miss his chance at the big time. Added elements, such as using the lowest forms of writing, such as scandal rag verbiage, turning it into pure poetry, made this a breakout best seller that was soon turned into a successful motion picture. Themes were starting to come into focus, particularly how all our ancestors were really vile and evil under that home spun exterior. Every motivation is doubtful, every outcome bad. The building block of the Ellroy universe was corruption; it was everywhere, and it was growing all the time.


'White Jazz' finished up the L.A. Quartet, establishing Ellroy as a literary force to be reckoned with. His public persona was in place; loud, brash, full of himself to a comical degree. Matched with his literary style, it was easy to consider him a right wing throwback from an earlier age. He wasn't the slightest bit hesitant to push this impression on the viewer, as seen below.


It is hard to tell when he's trying to be funny or trying to be shocking. The language in his novels is accurate for the times, as are the attitudes. I should know; I was alive for part of the time, I heard much worse as a child. Even my own father, who was tolerant of African Americans and Puerto Ricans at a time when most of his contemporaries weren't, would go off on Jews in a nanosecond. We all have prejudices, but they may be invisible in the moment. Time will show us all to be bigots of one stripe or another.


His career took off like a rocket in the mid 1990s, between a series of interconnected epics novels and a hit movie, fed by a public persona that was extremely confrontational. Ellroy went out of his way to look like Nazi bureaucrat, having nothing to do with the modern world - no computer, no cell phone, no social media - becoming a hit on the public appearance circuit. He wrote his funniest story, the novella 'Dick Contino's Blues', a wild mix of real people and 1950s exploitation movie plot, told entirely in 'Hush Hush' language, in 1994. Then he put that style aside and got serious.


The 'Underworld USA' trilogy is by far the best series of books that I have read in my life, bar none. They are brilliant, covering the hidden history of the United States from 1958 to 1972, terrible men doing horrible things while feeling entirely justified. It was a huge change for Ellroy, who had made his reputation from the two things that he left behind in these novels;  Los Angeles in the film noir era. What he found was the highest form of literature formed from the lowest elements of culture.


'American Tabloid', a kick to the nuts for over 600 pages, was the New York Time Book of the Year. The very next year, he duplicated the feat with a non-fiction book, the very confessional 'My Dark Places'. He treats his own life as harshly, perhaps even more so, than he treats anyone in his novels. The book is a long rumination over the death of his mother as he tries to solve her murder, in the process reconnecting with a mother that he had felt abandoned by. It is a heartbreaking confession of guilt, and it begins to show the true Ellroy beneath the bluster.


All the above is a long introduction to the specific book that I want to discuss, the second of the 'Underworld USA' novels, 'The Cold Six Thousand.' It suffered what all middle books in trilogies suffer, the mid-point letdown. Remember 'The Two Towers'? Ellroy's novel garnered praise and sold as well, but it wasn't as thrilling. 'American Tabloid'  was a daring book; by the second or third chapter, you knew that the conclusion would be the assassination of JFK. You wanted to see how it unfolded, you couldn't believe the audacity of the author, bringing in so many historical figures into his narrative.


'The Cold Six Thousand' has to do that same trick twice, with both Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy. Ellroy doesn't even focus on the murders that much; they feel inevitable as mobsters and government figures simply dispose of inconvenient public figures, knowing that they will get away with murder again. The canvas goes Panavision, large parts of the action taking place in Vietnam, Klan klonklaves in the Deep South, and most especially in Las Vegas. It is bad people getting involved in bad things on a Biblical scale.


There is also something else going on, hidden behind the casual racism and violence. Ellroy is coming out as a closet liberal, even a feminist. As is typical of his bigger novels, there are three strong but misguided men at the heart of the plot. They are pawns in the game of bigger men, instruments used to make things happen, lied to, clueless to the consequences of their actions. It is the three women in the book who are smarter, eventually gaining control of their destiny, something entirely beyond the intelligence of the males.


When you finally get to the last novel - it took fourteen years for Ellroy to finish these three, they are the thickest, most dense prose that I have ever encountered - it may occur to the reader that the real protagonist of the 21,500 page story is J. Edgar Hoover, the only character deeply involved in all the books. I'm old enough to remember Hoover; there was a weekly television series about the FBI playing for my entire childhood, exactly the kind of propaganda bullshit that his evil genius specialized in. He doesn't move the plot. Instead, he is the ultimate voyeur, and the trilogy is really a descent into his senility. It's not pretty, but it is Shakespearian.


In fact, the last great plot twist in this epic concerns a well-known rumor at the time, the secret files that Hoover used to keep himself in power well after mandatory retirement age. The entire world that Ellroy creates is place of comprehensive spying and record keeping, down to the barrage of reports and telephone transcripts that dot the three books. After Hoover's death, the great mystery was; where were the secret files J. Edgar kept on virtually everybody? While it provides a pat ending for the Clint Eastwood documentary, it was used in American Exploitation cinema decades earlier.


That's the key to James Ellroy's art; using exploitation elements and managing to turn them into something greater, a tapestry of our past that is not nice, but accurate. After all, we are a nation built on slavery and exploitation, the twin original sins that have corrupted out body politics to this day. Watching the news every day over this long summer has been like reliving my youth, with Watergate, the fall of Saigon, a nation on the brink of cultural collapse. My memory of the so-called Summer of Love was of people screaming hate in each other's face, not a momentary utopia to be viewed with nostalgia.


The paradox of human existence is that great art comes from troubled times. The period of 'Underworld USA' became, to use a phrase of Ellroy's, a 'shit storm.' We are living in similarly cloudy times. I wonder what new art will reflect it. Meanwhile, here is a long but excellent documentary, 'James Ellroy's Feast of Death', that deals with some of the themes explored here. I urge you to watch. History always repeats.





Wednesday, August 8, 2018

Lyrical Delusions



Writing lyrics is a strange situation, as I have mentioned before in this blog. But the human voice fairly cries out for something vaguely coherent to sing, and if you write enough music, you will find yourself writing about subjects that you originally found questionable. The only intelligent expression of  the dilemma of lyric writing was written by Frank Zappa, where he expressed his considerable opinion that all love songs were 'bad mental health'; if you actually tried to live the  attitudes of those words, you would wind up locked up in a mental institute.

I've written somewhere around 50 or 60 lyrics, not all of which I had the courage to actually use. It is a hard process, and inspiration only comes in rare bursts, usually when on vacation or at other odd moments. Normally it requires sitting down rather glumly and grinding out the majority of the verbiage after getting a few small points of inspiration. Some of the earliest lyrics that I did are painful to go back to, as I have also mentioned before.

I think that my lyrics have become better over time; every cycle of songwriting seems to be better than the one before, or at least more ambitious. Instead of pulling subjects out of the air, I started writing on themes. It was easier for the music, which flows with inspiration a great deal easier than the words. Practice may not make perfect, but it does let the writer focus on ways of getting something down that can be polished. That is the key; just get something down, no matter how bad you think it is at the time. Sit on it for a wh9ile, and then you may find something worth polishing up.




The above song, 'Fear the Gear', has an alternate version now in the alternate/outtakes bin that had a complete set of lyrics telling a twisted fairy tale. It was perfectly fine, except for my choice of  using studio trickery to lower my voice a couple of octaves. It was amusing the first few times and annoying after that, plus the music was a strong 7/4 beat with enough strange charm to stand on it's own. The voice only distracted from the best aspects of the song, IMHO, so that version was shit canned.

In the beginning I only did instrumentals, being the most reluctant vocalist. It's not that my voice is bad; in the genres that I normally work in, bad and good are relative to the attitude being presented. The more that I sang, the more that I realized that the only way to convincingly sing a song is to live it, at least the very moment it is leaving your lungs. Cover songs were usually the best choice, someone else's emotions laid bare the best way to learn.

There were more than a few times when my stomach dropped to the floor listening back to the vocals, realizing how badly I had misjudged my ability to sell a song. Those were carefully buried, exercises to learn from, not to be heard by the general public. There were success stories, songs that flowed along with the cover versions on an album, not drawing attention to themselves, occasionally shining brighter. I could only be the judge, and I found my efforts getting better.




It seemed that among the many breakthroughs that I had in 2014, while recording sixty songs so fast that I really didn't have time to self-edit, that my lyric writing improved dramatically. I was telling stories now, expressing opinions, even demonstrating emotions. For someone like myself who walls up my persona from the outside world, that's a big step. 'Face of Another' was a rare ballad and it worked both musically and as a set of lyrics, just a hint of enigma.

The video was also interesting; normally, if I am raiding existing films and videos for images, I try to stay away from facial close ups. As a video editor for twenty five years, I have noticed that most film and television is made of up close ups and/or people talking to each other. If you cut out all the 'talking heads', you might wind up with ten minutes of so out of one hundred. Instead of my normal practice of discarding all that material and only using the long traveling shots, this video breaks my personal rule and is nearly all lingering close ups.

It works for the subject of 'Face of Another', which as a lyric was also a departure from my normal topics. I had written ballads before and also in the 2014 project, but they were mostly instrumentals. Expressing tenderness in music is a breeze compared to writing it down then singing it. Yet here I get away with it, selling the content, getting the music right, and even getting the visuals to synchronize. A lot of work went into this one, for sure.




From 2017, 'Dropped a Dime' is pure ambition. Here, I'm trying to tell a mini-story, a tale of personal betrayal between lovers, straight out of a film noir or pulp detective novel. James Ellroy is an especially influential writer, and this reflects his work as well as all the television and cinema of the 1940s and 1950s. I even went to the Prelinger Archives and found appropriately old footage to edit together for the video.

The phrase just 'dropped' into my head one morning; I even had to look it up to make sure that I trying understood the meaning. Since I keep a very active diary during the recording sessions, which tend to produce a minimum of two songs a week, I wrote down what I had. Within a matter of days, while sitting down at the piano, the chords just fell under my hand. I knew that I had the music to fit the idea instantly.

That's when the work started; I had to get a complete set of lyrics, including plot points and a middle eight that was inspired by the type of songwriting U2 does, as well as an arrangement. During recording, the vocals were typically arduous, and as is often the case, patched in nearly line by line. But the end result was something that I really hadn't done before, a story song from someone else's perspective completely. It slotted in well with an album that accidentally became a collection of love songs, the bad including the good.





The last example on display here is 'Weird In Me.' If I thought that 'Dropped a Dime' was ambitious, I was in for a shock with this one. Love is not a subject that I had been comfortable expressing in lyrics; in fact, I have avoided it like the plague. Yet after so many songs and albums, I felt that it was time to actually show some display of public affection to my wife.

Yet when the lyrics were finished, once again growing from a few small germs of verbal inspiration through hard work into a complete thought, it somehow seemed to be all about me. It was, to put it most simply, a confession of how difficult I must be to live with. And yet my wife has done this for thirty five years, and actually been a good sport about it most of the time. So I went all out on the music, and a simple folk song wound up becoming a progressive rock track.

The video only compounded the difficulties; what was I supposed to do, show a bunch of photos of my wife, myself, or the two of us? How about our wedding album from 1984?  Fortunately, I found enough material from all over the place to put something together that was so close and yet so far away at the same time to work. And so I present it to you, the rare love song to my wife, for loving someone who doesn't always deserve it. And I love her back even more.